Thursday, June 11, 2026
Three Reading Amigos
Wednesday, June 10, 2026
The Awful Grace of God
I listen to Tim Keller sermons everyday in my car from the library of sermons I purchased for Susan as a Christmas gift years ago. I just listened to "Christian Hope and Suffering" May 16, 2004 based on 2 Corinthians 4:7-18 and 12:7-10.
In that sermon Keller states "As Asechylus, of all people (the Greek poet), once wrote, "It's God's law that he who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep, pain that cannot forget, falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own dispite, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God"
Translated from Agamemnon "The Oresteia" a more direct translation would read:
“Zeus… has established this law:
that wisdom comes through suffering.
Pain, remembering its wounds,
drips before the heart in sleep;
and even against our will
comes understanding…
from the gods.”
What confused me from Tim Keller's statement is the term "The awful grace of God". Rarely have I seen the word grace used with the word awful. He was translating from a Greek philosopher who was polytheistic and not a Christian for emphasis not theological Christian principle.
BUT.... maybe that is an appropriate term in the mystery/paradox of understanding suffering, hope and grace in Christianity.
Grace is an unmerited gift from God and so suffering (awful grace) might also be an unmerited gift from God. Pain that you didn't seek or ask for - that has a path to hope and wisdom.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postscript - 6/11/2026
I was re-listening to the audio sermon only to discover that T. Keller's reciting of the quote sounded like "all filling Grace of God". I even had R.M.2 listen to the quote as we were traveling to Ky to meet with P.N. for our mini book club meeting and he said it sounded like "awe filling Grace of God". This lead me to more research to determine regardless of what T. Keller said - what was the actual quote. It came from Edith Hamilton's 1937 translation:
falls drop by drop upon the heart…
and in our own despite, against our will,
comes wisdom to us
by the awful grace of God.”
Tuesday, June 9, 2026
Inflation Management
Jenna and I discussed inflation after a complete day of swim lessons and an afternoon of "quiet time" with her boys. Interesting that Jenna (a Milliennial - GenY) is concerned about inflation given that from college to now her actual realized inflation rate (13 yrs) is only 2.79% but close to my comment of thinking I have experienced 3% over my 50 years.
Later I looked up my personal inflation since college (1976 -2026) of 50 years. The exact data based result using CPI is that $1 in 1976 is equivalent to $5.85 today or 3.6% compounded. My gut guess of 3% was low.
It's hard to remember prices out of college, however - my first new car a 1976 Buick Regal was $5K; my first house in Hyde Park 1980 was $75K ; coffee at the office was subsidized $0.10 but normally $0.50; at college a pitcher of 3.2 beer was $1.50.
So what are the big wealth destroyers - inflation, healthcare, taxes and.... mis managing your money.
My Wisnerism Vistage quote related to this topic:
"Manage your money or it will manage you."
Monday, June 8, 2026
AI Stopping Point
I have been pondering why should there be any worry about AI in its recursive self improvement (RSI). Isn't human intelligence (both individually and collectively) just a recursive self improvement process also?
Not so says Copilot. "Humans absolutely show feedback-driven self-improvement and learning how to learn = a recursive pattern. BUT.... RSI is defined more narrowly: A system improves the MECHANISM that creates the improvement, autonomously and repeatedly."
1. Humans don't directly rewrite their "code". You can't redesign your brain.
2, The loop isn't fully self-directed. RSI does self modification without external input. Humans are heavily external input not fully internal.
3. No guaranteed acceleration . RSI increases the rate of future improvements after each improvement. Humans improve rapidly in early life but plateau or even decline.
Bottom line RSI upgrades the engine, not just the performance and outcome.
BUT - what "stops" RSI within AI? Recursion is an infinite "black hole" - self reference can go on forever without a base case or energy constraints. What then is AI's stopping condition?
Copilot answers this- "In current AI systems, the base case/stopping rule is not magically discovered by the model itself - it is normally defined BY HUMANS through goals, tests, validation criteria, and resource limits. Current systems can do pieces of self-improvement, but they do not yet close the full loop automomously."
And that is why we need to put some guard rails on AI. Stopping must still be enforced by human-defined objectives, validation tests, and resource or safety limits. The Pope's 240 page Encyclical Letter about AI is worth attention - even if lazily I let NotebookLM do my thinking :)
Sunday, June 7, 2026
Recursive Navel Watching
I was watching Face the Nation when Associate Professor of John Hopkins (also advisor to Antrhopic) Ben Buchanan mentioned recursive self improvement of Artificial Intelligence. I'm guessing this is one of the challenging uncharted territories of AI. Anytime the term recursive is used, my own radar of interest in infinity arises. Recursive logic or in computer terms "Do Loop" provides both paradox and infinite resources to reach an outcome (if one exists). So when I asked copilot to define what recursive self improvement is and it presented one of the sources it was using ---- MY BLOG!!! ... well that was curious.
Why my blog I wondered? Only to discover that Copilot always checks my personal Microsoft 365 data - emails, onedrive, calendar and contacts in forming its answer. Hence Copilot found a pdf file of my blog sitting in onedrive with references to AI, recursive, self, and self improvement. As copilot itself said "By design, I'm required to search your personal data even for general questions". Inside this blog it found (1) Direct AI related content (strong match); (2) General "Self Improvement/Improvememt" language (broad match); So it casts a wide semantic net, not just exact phrase matching.
Now I understand how it personalizes answers indicating my interests and suggests follow-on questions in the possible related areas of my past inquiries - it is not just my past chats but also emails, attachments, data, schedule and contacts.
But does that mean it is just a recursive confirmation bias (maybe even narsassitic) machine that frames answers in ways that are scycophantic. Reminds me of the March 21, 2026 Wall Street Journal article by Alexandra Samuel "How I stop AI from Telling me What I want to Hear".
So what does copilot suggest as a proper prompt to avoid this tendency - After every question add this command: Answer using general knowledge only; do not use my personal data; analyze and challenge assumptions; provide objective reasoning with at least one alternative perspective.
I'll save the analysis of the danger of recursive self improvement for a later blog since this chat drove me into a internal "Do Loop" of navel watching.
Saturday, June 6, 2026
Bitcoin Treasure Hunt
As I was searching old hard drives for the passport story of 1997, I happened upon a June 2015 folder titled "bitcoin". A couple of years ago, I had embarked on a treasure hunt in my old computers searching for files titled "wallet.dat" and even found some. But alas - didn't know what to do next and gave up on thinking I had any old bitcoins stored locally. Here is where AI comes to the rescue. When I found this 2015 folder with a file titled "wallet.dat", AI motivated me to try to discover what was in that file.
Next I downloaded Bitcoincore with it's methodical (and long very long) blockchain synching process to merge my old wallet.dat into it's stored folder. Next I had to wait for the synch to arrive at June 2015 with great anticipation that I would find a treasure of bitcoins.
Alas - no transactions. I vaguely remember playing around with educating myself on bitcoins back then - reading about them and like everyone considering them like rewards points with trivial redemption. So it is likely I tried to set up a wallet then - but then lost interest.
My interest revived in 2017 when I set up a coinbase account and tried my $100 experiment of getting money in and out of the account to prove that bitcoin could be an alternate currency. But back then I was unwilling to trust that bitcoin was more than just a meme type activity.
And so there still remains skeptics about cyptocurrency and it's proper place in a diversified portfolio. And maybe still is just buried treasure for future pirates.






